Search for: "W Vasquez" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 4:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
[W]e remand to the BIA to apply circuit nexus precedent to Vasquez-Rivera’s asylum claim and claim for withholding of removal based on her membership in her family. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Robert Scavone Jr.
  Empress, 2016 WL 4501673, at *11 (“[W]e now hold that the ‘cat’s paw’ theory may be used to support recovery for claims of retaliation in violation of Title VII. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am by Steve Kalar
’” Id. at *2 (emphases added).Held: “[W]e adhere to our precedent that requires us to decline to review whether the district court procedurally erred by failing to grant Vasquez–Cruz a departure or by failing to consider departures before applying the § 3553(a) factors. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Vasquez v Acevedo, 2019 WL 3310334 (6th Circuit, 2019) the Sixth Circuit affirmed an order of the district court which denied the petition of Colombian father Edison Alberto Carvajal Vasquez (“Carvajal”) for the return of his one-year-old son, TCG, to Colombia. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
At that point, the company didn't need her to sign a whole new set of onboarding documents -- they already had her W-4, her date of birth, etc. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
10 May 2019, 10:53 am by Jon Sands
Smith w/Hawkins & Vratil). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:03 am by Steve Hall
  He became Governor of Texas upon the resignation of George W. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]